The arrangement works according to what he calls WA checklists. Controls are subject to ratification by the participants. AO members undertake to exchange information on sensitive dual-use goods and technologies and to report on such transfers and denials of controlled goods to non-participants. At the U.S.-Russian Summit in Vancouver, Canada, on April 4, 1993, the Presidents of Russia and the United States agreed that it was necessary to respond as briefly as possible to issues of cooperation on the non-proliferation of missiles and missile technology, in accordance with the principles of existing international agreements. They decided to work together to remove barriers that hinder Russia`s access to the global market for high-tech and related services. The purpose of these changes was to prevent Western tech companies from selling surveillance technologies to governments known to violate human rights. However, some tech companies have expressed concerns that the scope of controls could be too broad, limiting the ability of security researchers to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities. Google and Facebook have criticized the deal for the restrictions it imposes on activities such as penetration testing, sharing threat information and bug bounty programs.   They argue that the restrictions will weaken the security of participating countries and will do little to curb threats from non-participating countries.   Twelfth plenary session of 5 and 6. December in Vienna marked the tenth anniversary of the AO and was led by Ambassador Peter Shannon of Australia.
The plenary successfully agreed on a number of changes to the checklists, while expressing the wish to establish a dialogue with the AO Panel of Experts and the Missile Technology Control Regime in order to improve the regime`s ability to keep pace with technological advances, market trends and international security developments. In addition, the plenary decided to make available to the public two best practice documents – Best practices for the implementation of intangible technology transfer controls and guidelines on best practices for licensing items on the basic list and the sensitive list of dual-use items and technologies – in order to complement the plenary`s agreement to continue to give high priority to transparency and contacts with non-participating States and international organizations. strengthen export controls. Documents Primary documents, including contract texts and related med notes, declarations and other related documents. In November 1993, negotiations began among the 17 member States of COCOM on the structure and objectives of its successor organization. Members agreed to continue to implement restrictions on technology transfer until an agreement was reached on the successor organization. The 9. .